Iran and the Muslim Doctrine of Deception

The Ayatollahs

President Obama made an interesting statement in his Aug. 5 speech. He compared the anti-American hardliners in Iran to those members of the U.S. Congress who oppose his agreement.

Remember, he said, “In fact, it’s those [Iranian] hardliners who are most comfortable with the status quo. It’s those hardliners chanting ‘Death to America!’ who have been most opposed to the deal. They’re making common cause with the Republican Caucus” (emphasis added).

Those who oppose the agreement have “common cause” with terrorists?

I guess Obama would feel more at home and have “common cause” with those Iranian leaders who have publicly supported his deal with Iran. It does make you wonder, though, when you look into what some of the supporters of the deal had to say, people who apparently have “common cause” with this administration.

The following are some statements by several Iranian leaders who are “supporters” of the Obama deal:

  • “Saying ‘Death to America!‘ is easy. We need to express ‘Death to America!‘ with action” (“Moderate” Iranian President Hassan Rouhani, May 2013).
  • “Of course, yes, death to America!” (Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Khamenei, March 2015).
  • “Our policies toward the arrogant government of the United States will not be changed at all” (Iranian Supreme Leader Khamenei, July 2015 statement made after the deal was announced).
  • “If a day comes when the world of Islam is duly equipped with the arms Israel has in possession, the strategy of colonialism would face a stalemate because application of an atomic bomb would not leave anything in Israel but the same thing would just produce damages in the Muslim world” (“moderate” former Iranian President Rafsanjani, December 2001).

Now let me get this straight: If, as an American, you oppose the deal, you are in league with the “Iranian hardliners,” but if you support the deal, you are in agreement with those who wish to destroy America and Israel?

I thought we were looking for a means to stop Iran from attaining nuclear weapons. Apparently, in the Obama administration, there is an entirely different meaning to Iran’s attainment of nukes. Let me reiterate: Israel is well aware of Iranian President Rafsanjani’s (and much of the Muslim world’s) view of the use of nuclear weapons in the Middle East – the total annihilation of Israel vs. “damages in the Muslim world.” Death suffered by the faithful in a war with “unbelievers” is a destiny to be sought. It means eternity in paradise, so the deaths of hundreds of thousands or even millions of “shahids” would only amount to “damages in the Muslim world.” It might be well to keep in mind that the Israelis also have a position worth remembering: “Never again!”

The mistake made by Westerners, in general, and Americans in particular, is in thinking devout Muslims have the same regard for human life as do those in the Judeo-Christian West. Additionally, the concept of “negotiation” by Muslims with non-Muslims differs radically from the accepted standards held by the West.

The West, generally speaking, is not, but must be made, aware of a Muslim doctrine called taqiyya, which permits them to deceive their enemies when doing so will be advantageous to Islams cause. Here are some quotes from the founder himself, the prophet Muhammad:

  • (Bukhari 3,49,857) Muhammad said, “A man who brings peace to the people by making up good words or by saying nice things, though untrue, does not lie.”
  • (Bukhari 4,52,267) Muhammad cried out,”Jihad is deceit.”
  • (Bukhari 5,59,369) Bin Maslama volunteered to kill an enemy for Muhammad, then said, “Give me permission to deceive him with lies so that my plot will succeed.” Muhammad replied, “You may speak falsely to him.”
  • (Bukhari 8,78,618) Abu Bakr, the prophet Muhammad’s closest friend and adviser and first convert to Islam, said, “If I make a pledge and later discover a more worthy pledge, then I will take the better action and make amends for my earlier promise.”

If deception of an enemy is advantageous to Islam, it is not a sin.

The reason there are translators at the United Nations is so all participants will be able to understand what is actually being said.

Could it be we need a translator of Islam in order to truly understand that they may not mean what we mean when we say what we mean?

Default Comments (1)

One thought on “Iran and the Muslim Doctrine of Deception

  1. princetonuniversity says:

    THE BIG LIE: “Islamic Extremism Is Not Widely Supported by Muslims”
    What Muslims Believe: A summation of dozens of polls :

    Note: WM stands for World Muslims, USM stands for American Muslims, EUM stands for European Muslims, EM stands for Egyptian Muslims, PM stands for Palestinian Muslims, JM stands for Jordanian Muslims. )

    *50% WM supported Osama bin Laden.
    *30% WM believe 9/11 attacks were justified.

    *65% EUM say sharia outweighs all other laws.
    *45% EUM believe Jews cannot be trusted.

    *Only 58% of USM reject Al-Qaeda.
    *58% USM believe criticism of Islam is not a 1st Amendment right.
    *12% USM believe blaspheming of Islam should be punishable by death.
    *32% USM believe sharia should be the law of the land.

    *37% BM believe British Jews are a legitimate target for terror.
    *33% BM believe apostate Muslims should be executed.
    *78% BM believe cartoonists who insult Mohammed should be punished.
    *68% BM support prosecution of those who insult Islam.
    *33% BM strongly agree that wives should be forced to obey husbands.
    *Only 34% of BM believe the Holocaust happened.
    *61% BM want homosexuality punished.
    *62% BM do not support free speech.

    *61% EM approve of attacks on US.
    *84% EM support death penalty for apostates.
    *77% EM support flogging/amputations.
    *82% EM support stoning adulterers.
    *62% JM approve of attacks on US.
    *55% JM have positive view of Hezbollah.
    *60% JM have positive view of Hamas.

    *83% PM approve of attacks on US.
    *89% PM support targeting Israeli women and children.
    *68% PM believe suicide attacks against civilians are justifiable.

    *83% Pakistani Muslims support stoning of adulterers.
    *75% of Parisian Muslim women say they wear face coverings out of fear.

    A compendium of results from dozens of polls, undertaken by dozens of different polling organizations, concerning the attitudes of Muslims throughout the world concerning terrorism and sharia. Bear in mind, however, that a fundamental doctrine of Islam, taqiyya, dictates that mendacity which promotes Allah is not only not proscribed – it is prescribed. Therefore the true picture is even more frightening than the data suggest.

    How do Anglicized Islamophiles or useful dhimmis address the issues of unprecedented silence and absence of presence of the “mainstream Muslim majority” (MMM)? Tell me, where are those legions of the MMM? In what cities are they marching? In what newspapers are they writing? In what university seminars are they seeking to boycott Islamic nations fostering terror? Could there be no protestations by the mainstream Muslim majority against subservience to a supposed minority of radicals?

    Please spare me the resolutely irrelevant response that American news media do not show moderate Islamists because such items are boring. These things are not shown because they do not exist. Even those who would benefit the most from garnering sympathy for Islam cannot produce video documentation for Islamic pleas for peace among men. Islam is peace only for those who submit to Allah. And Allah – not politics, not poverty, not Western colonialism – is the underlying motivation throughout the umma.

    The video documentations ( which may be found on the website for the Middle East Media Research Institute (MEMRI) ) of Islamic reaction to terrorist acts show massive rallies in support of the perpetrators. I dare anyone to find a “Je Suis Charlie” sign in an Islamic rally. Instead the sea of protestors hold banners of protest – often in Arabic and English – against the Great and Little Satans. After 9-11, children in Gaza received candy in celebration of the atrocity. These are not isolated incidents. They are a way of life.

    I have searched, in vain, the for Middle Eastern videos critical of terrorism. Instead, the Middle Eastern media televises hour after hour of imams inciting to riot. Classroom activities in which children are inculcated to hate America and to view Jews as swine and apes are regularly shown.

    A well-produced Iranian anti semitic film, “Saturday Hunter”, ( a clip from which may be viewed at ) depicts Jews massacring Muslims. It is inspired by the infamous “Protocols of the Elders of Zion”.

    A Syrian dramatic series was broadcast on Al-Manar (Hezbollah), on November 18, 2003, and on Channel 2 TV (Iran), in September 2009. It depicts a rabbi cutting the throat of a Christian child in order to obtain blood, which is used in the preparation of matzo. Based on the infamous blood libel, a clip may be seen on the page for Palestinian Media Watch:

    These programs are representative of what passes for “entertainment” in the Islamic Middle East. Whereas in the United States there is vocal criticism of mainstream media’s near monolithic allegiance to President Obama’s policies, no such criticism exists or dares to exist in the umma.

    The voices of so-called MMM are mere whispers drowned out by the vociferous cries for jihad on the part of the very real multitudinous majority . The pronouncement and writings of virtually all American muslims are nothing more than taqiyya, attired in the vestments of academia. Many polling results reflect the loathsome cultural mendacity of the respondents: Nothing more than lying performed in the name of Allah. Lying to pollsters, lying to reporters, lying to treaty negotiators. Deceitful responses which promote Islam are praised and encouraged by the Quran and the Hadith.

    How many Muslims marched in Paris? Where was the rending of Islamic garments after 9-11? Where is the international Muslim outcry for divest, sanction and boycott against the umma states which both sanction and sponsor terrorism and which subjugate their populace to innumerable human rights violations? How many Muslim educators have written apologetics against Boko Haram? These are the realities.

    In fact, many moderate Muslims are, understandably, afraid. But those who are brave enough to be the “Voice of the Umma”, or “Tehran Aisha” must be called to the forefront, lest their countrymen be remembered by history as the “good Germans” of the 21st century.

    To those who say let us trust those who do not merit trust, I say “Balderdash”. The Jihadi Curtain is real, ever present and lethal. For Islamicists, deception (Taqiyya) is a pillar of Islam.

Leave a Reply

Facebook Comments (1)

Disqus Comments (0)

%d bloggers like this: