Freedom of Speech Slipping Away

By Star Parker

As the new Biden-Harris administration assumes power, the most basic American freedom of speech and expression is under unprecedented threat.

For the first time ever, I am concerned about my freedom to do my work, to run a policy institute addressing issues of culture, race and poverty from a conservative perspective.

Technology -- the internet -- which was largely nonexistent just 25 years ago, now plays a huge role in our lives as a tool of communication.

In a survey just published by the Pew Research Center, 86% say they "often" or "sometimes" get their news from a digital device -- smartphone, tablet or computer. This compared with 68% who say they "often" or "sometimes" get their news from television, 50% who get it from radio and 32% who get it from print publications.

According to Statista.com, the United States has 223 million Facebook users, almost the size of the entire U.S. population over age 18. Per Pew, 22% of U.S. adults use Twitter.

These developments have put enormous power at the disposal of technology firms over what we see and read.

Power alone doesn't worry me. Exclusive power, power to control, does.

The decision by Twitter to kick the president of the United States off of Twitter, disconnecting him from the 89 million who follow him, is mind-boggling.

President Trump has noted, with total legitimacy, that he turned to social media as his platform of preference to communicate with the country because of widespread bias in the mainstream media.

What gives the technology companies so much discretion over communication, the oxygen of our free country?

This comes from a provision of the 1996 Communications Decency Act that was passed to set the ground rules for the powerful new technologies that were emerging. Technology companies are protected from liability for the content they carry: The liability exists with whomever provided that content. But they were also given discretion over what they choose to carry.

The discretion part comes from logic that the operators of these platforms should be able to refuse truly inflammatory, dangerous content. But what about content that is normally protected by the First Amendment?

Jack Dorsey, CEO of Twitter, appointed himself judge and jury, deciding that President Trump incited the assault on the Capitol building and banning the president from Twitter for life.

We know that President Trump's own words were that the demonstration on Capitol Hill should be "peaceful." The point is, if Donald Trump broke the law, this should be determined through legal channels, not by the subjective decision of a businessperson with a net worth of some $12 billion accrued because of American freedom.

I produce a weekly television talk show, "CURE America with Star Parker." The show was booted off Vimeo because the far-left Southern Poverty Law Center identifies one of our Christian advertisers as a hate group and one pastor said that homosexuality is a sin.

Now quoting the Bible, expressing views of a believing Christian, is out of bounds -- banned from the nation's major media platforms?

We must recognize that our nation's most precious commodity, our freedom to speak, to act and to assemble, is seriously being threatened.

Because those controlling these technology companies disproportionately have political sympathies to the left, it is the freedom of conservatives that is most seriously under siege.

Fortunately, many are now concerned.

The argument is made that First Amendment speech protections only pertain to government action, not private companies. But technology has enabled a concentration of private power not previously imagined.

The Communications Decency Act could be amended such that speech on technology platforms receives the same protections as all speech protected by the First Amendment.

Another possibility would be to amend the Civil Rights Act to include those with religious conviction based on teachings of Judaism and Christianity as a protected class.

Conservatives must push for new law and new platforms.

[Star Parker is president of the Center for Urban Renewal and Education and host of the new weekly news talk show "Cure America with Star Parker." To find out more about Star Parker and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate website at www.creators.com.]

COPYRIGHT 2021 CREATORS.COM

Related Posts

1 Comment


Charles Walkup Jr - January 20th, 2021 at 10:47am

Yes, it's time to amend the law so that the online dictators can be sued. Or perhaps new legislation is called for in terms of a few powerful persons colluding and creating a monopoly on public speech and their resulting ability to censor.

RE: adding religious discrimination to Civil Rights Act protections, I thought it was already added.

However, i submit that what is needed is a "Liberty Preservation Act" which states that

Discrimination is NOT a constitutional principle (the word is not in the document), and that the government has no legitimate authority to prohibit discrimination by individuals (persons and entities such as a business, church, etc.).

Liberty is, in fact, our right TO discriminate - to make our own decisions without government coercion. It was first (1776) declared an unalienable right (Creator-endowed, not government-given). Hence, government has NO authority to deny it. Then (1787) "We, the People ... in order to secure the blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our posterity (did) ordain and establish this Constitution ...." So we (as individuals) have both an unalienable and a constitutional right to discriminate. The real problem is government discrimination, and that is exactly what "non-discrimination" laws are. By "protecting" a designated group, the government is showing partiality, and that is unjust. Just as Jim Crow/segregation laws were government discrimination favoring white people and denying Liberty to Black People, just so are "non-discrimination" laws that protect a specified group. Government's duty is to protect Life and Liberty for all, rather than protecting any group from individual discrimination. Liberty must be restored to it's preeminent position, and discrimination knocked off it's exalted pedestal before it completely destroys Liberty.

Recent

Archive

 2021

Categories

Tags

1776 1964 90 million ACT Abolitionists African Americans Al Sharpton Alabama American Voters America Amy Coney Barrett Asians BLM Behavior Bible Bill of rights Black Americans Black History Black Leader Black Lives Matter Black Millionaires Black achievement Black community Black families Matter Black kids Black people Blacks Bureau of Justice Statistics CBS CNN California Capitalism Capitol Building Carbon emissions Christianity City government Civil Rights Climate Change Coca-cola College Board data Condoleezza Rice Congressional Budget Office Conservatives Conservative Conspiracy Theories Covid-19 Crime Cuba DNA Delta airlines Democrat party Democratic socialism Democrats Democrat Derek Chauvin Dick Gregory Diversity Documentary Donald Trump Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Earth Day Election integrity Equality Equity Facebook Fake News Fascism Fascist Film Fire Fighters Foundation Founding Fathers Free Market Freedm Freedom's Journal Insitute Freedom's Journal Magazine Freedoms Journal Institute Freedoms Journal Magazine Freedom George Floyd George W. Bush Georgia Global Warming Governors Grades HBCUs Harriet Tubman Heritage Foundation High School Hillary Clinton Historically Black Colleges and Universities History Hitler Hollywood House Hugo Chavez Hypocrisy IMDb Identity politics Inclusion Inventors Jim Crow Jimmy Carter Joe biden John Kass Jokes Justice Kamala Harris Karl Marx Katrina Kingmaker Klu Klux Klan LAw LGBTQ LIverals Larry Elder Latinos Law enforcement Lawsuits Legacy of Slavery Liberal progressives Liberals Liberal MLB MLK MSNBC Mainstream media Marxist Maxine Waters Media Metaphore Morality NAACP Nancy Pelosi Nazi Neck Holds Noam Chomsky Normal North Carolina Nuclear Obergefell v. Hodges Oracle Oscars PPolice Pastor Patrisse Cullors Power plant President Donald Trump President Joe Biden President Obama Press Progressive Race Card Race Raphael Warnock Republican Party Republicans Republican Right to Vote Roe vs Wade Russia SAT SJW Scandinavia School Choice Shawshank redemption Slavery Social Justice Soviet Union Speech Stacey Abrams Steve Crowder Stock market Students Supporters Sweden Teachers' Union Tesla The Reverend Thomas Jennings Thomas Sowell Truth vs Lies Truth Twitter US Constitution Uncle Tom Underground Railroad Unity Venezuela Voter ID Voting Rights Act Voting law WGN Walter Williams Warner Bros. Television Group Washington D.C. Wealth creation White House White People White cops Whites Woke YouTube abnormal academia activists advancement affirmative action angry anti-semitic antifa antiracists arrested arrest biology boycott business owners cancer civility college comedian conservative women contempt coverage criminal justice critical race theory culture war death penality debate delusion democracy discrimination diveristy driveway economic recovery economics economist economy education election reform elections employee employer entrance exams executive orders faith leader first amendment force gender greenhouse gases hate speech hero homicide hyperbole impeachment inequality inheritance innovation investments jobs kids lies life in prison lock downs major league baseball mandates masks microaggression minimum wage monument moral superiority murder name callling neopronouns officers oppressed opt out patents poineers police brutality police political exploitation politicians politics poverty power prison progressives qualified immunity race and culture racism racist nation racist radiation ratings reactor regulations reparations restaurant retirement riot rules for thee and not for me scholar sexism sexuality skin color snow social distancing social media social security socialism stereotypes subjectivism systemic racism trial tribalism unemployment victim culture wages white privilege women in history