Progressives against Civil Rights

By Charles Love

A new generation of “antiracist” intellectuals and activists is rewriting rules, canceling nonconformists, and making a grand attempt to rid America of what they consider its systemic racism. With the support of academia, media, and many major corporations, they seem well positioned to achieve their goals. They even have support in in the White House, as President Joe Biden stated in a press conference last month that he will make “racial equity” a priority for the “whole of government.” Yet these efforts may encounter a surprising obstacle: the Civil Rights Act of 1964.

The Civil Rights Act was passed to end decades of overt discrimination and disenfranchisement against blacks. It was the seminal step in moving the country toward the equality that civil rights leaders had spent years fighting to achieve, a realization of Martin Luther King Jr.’s dream that his children be judged by the content of their character, not the color of their skin. It seemed to be what the nation needed, what those fighting for equal rights wanted, and what the founding principles of the country demanded—however imperfectly they had been implemented over the years. But that was long ago.

Today’s advocates see things differently. What America needs now, they say, is not equality, but equity: a concept that trades the old notion of colorblindness for an obsessive focus on racial bean-counting and requires the race-conscious redistribution of power from whites to underrepresented minorities.

The two concepts are contradictory. Careful examination of progressive demands juxtaposed with the language of the Civil Rights Act leads to the conclusion that those demanding equity should demand the law’s repudiation.

Consider the actions of government officials during the Covid-19 pandemic. As the rollout of the vaccine unfolds, nearly half of U.S. states have stated openly that they want to prioritize the delivery of vaccines to “black and brown communities.” New York governor Andrew Cuomo chastised the federal government for not having a provision for outreach to minorities. Meantime, when civil rights leaders demanded that funding be allocated explicitly to black businesses, Oregon answered the call, establishing a fund that set aside $62 million in federal money for “black relief + resiliency.” All of this appears to violate Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, which states that no person on the ground of race, color, or national origin can be “denied the benefits of, or be subjected to, discrimination under any program or activity receiving federal financial assistance.”

Recently, New York mayor Bill de Blasio took steps to correct what he saw as systemic inequalities in the city’s selective-enrollment schools. Because the student body at these schools did not reflect the city’s racial makeup, de Blasio changed the admissions requirements from grades, attendance, and test scores to a lottery to increase the enrollment percentage of minority students. The move was heralded by equity advocates, with seemingly no regard for the provision in the Civil Rights Act that states, “desegregation shall not mean the assignment of students to public schools in order to overcome racial imbalance.”

Some “antiracists” have advocated the formation of racially segregated spaces—from black dorms and segregated graduations to the forcible reversal of gentrification in traditionally black neighborhoods—apparently unaware that Title II of the Civil Rights Act bans discrimination in public accommodations.

In the business world, progressives aim explicitly to elevate minorities at the expense of whites. Companies across the country have paid huge sums to “diversity trainers,” such as Robin DiAngelo, who ostensibly work to counteract bias in the workplace but actually further it by vilifying whites. Recently, a Coca-Cola employee leaked slides of a company diversity training session where employees were told to “be less white.” Yet Title VII of the Civil Rights Act bans attempts “to limit, segregate, or classify his employees in any way which would deprive or tend to deprive any individual of employment opportunities or otherwise adversely affect his status as an employee, because of such individual’s race, color, religion, sex, or national origin.”

Few employees are willing to risk pushing back against such treatment, and those who do can face additional discrimination. When Jodi Shaw, a former Smith College librarian, filed a complaint with the school’s institutional compliance officer over its mandatory diversity trainings and alleged hostile treatment, she was rebuffed—for a strange reason. In the words of the office of equity and inclusion representative, “The Civil Rights Act of 1964 was created to protect traditionally marginalized people.”

In fact, the Civil Rights Act protects all Americans from racial discrimination, a fact too many contemporary progressives have forgotten. How else to explain law professor Brandon Hasbrouck’s call for “vote reparations,” according to which the votes of black Americans should count twice? No matter how far-fetched Hasbrouck’s idea, it is telling that a law professor would advance a proposal so at odds with the law’s mandate that “no person shall apply any standard, practice, or procedure different from the standards, practices, or procedures applied under such law or laws to other individuals.”

Those demanding what I call “adjective justice”—social, racial, and so on—do not want equality. They justify discrimination on the basis of helping the oppressed. This approach lies at the heart of what I call progressive racism, a sort of kinder, gentler racism. Regardless of their intent, such an approach is irreconcilable with the letter of civil rights laws and the principles of the movement that led to their passage. If “antiracists” truly believe in their cause, it is only a matter of time before they decide that the Civil Rights Act of 1964 is an obstacle to the equity they seek and must be repealed for the greater good.

[Charles Love is the assistant executive director of Seeking Educational Excellence, host of The Charles Love Show, and the author of the upcoming book Race Crazy: BLM, 1619, and the Progressive Racism Movement.]

Related Posts

No Comments


Recent

Archive

 2021

Categories

Tags

#race riot 1619 project 1776 1964 90 million ACT Abolitionists African Americans Afrocentric Al Sharpton Alabama Alaska Amazon American Flag American Hero American Voters American racism America Amy Coney Barrett Apple Asians Attorney General Keith Ellison Authenticity BLM Banks Barack Obama Behavior Bible Big government Bill of rights Black Americans Black Codes Black History Black Leader Black Lives Matter Black Millionaires Black Wall Street Black achievement Black community Black families Matter Black kids Black people Black racist Black towns Black voter suppression Black vote Blacks Black Breonna Taylo Bureau of Justice Statistics CARES Act CBS CEO Elon Musk CNN CRT California Capitalism Capitol Building Carbon emissions Catholic Cato Institute Charter schools Chicago Chinese Christianity Christian City government Civil Rights Act of 1964 Civil Rights Civil War Climate Change Coal Coca-cola College Board data Color Condoleezza Rice Congressional Black Caucus Congressional Budget Office Congress Conservatives Conservative Conspiracy Theories Cops Covid-19 Create a crowd Crime Cuba DNA DNC DOJ David Boaz Delta airlines Democrat party Democratic Party Democratic socialism Democrats Democrat Derek Chauvin Developer Dick Gregory Diversity Documentary Donald Trump Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Earth Day Earth Edgewater's mayor Edgewater\'s mayor Election integrity Equality Equity Eskimo FDA Facebook Fake News Fascism Fascist Fathers Federal Government Film Fire Fighters For the People Act Foundation Founding Fathers Frederick Douglass Free Market Freedm Freedom's Journal Insitute Freedom's Journal Magazine Freedoms Journal Institute Freedoms Journal Magazine Freedom Free Gangs Gasoline Gaza Strip George Floyd George W. Bush Georgia German Global Warming Goverment Governors Grades Guns Gwen Berry HBCUs Hamas Hard work Harriet Tubman Hatred Heritage Foundation High School Hillary Clinton Historically Black Colleges and Universities History Hitler Hollywood House Republican leadership House Housing Hugo Chavez Human Race Hypocrisy IMDb Ibram X. Kendi Identity politics Inclusion Independence Day Inventors Israel Jeff Bezos Jesus Christ Jews Jim Crow Jimmy Carter Joe biden John Cena John F. Kennedy John Kass John Lewis Voting Right Advancement Act John Lewis Voting Rights Advancement Act Jokes July 4th Jury Verdict Justice K-12 Kamala Harris Karl Marx Katrina Kingmaker Klu Klux Klan LAw LGBTQ LIverals Lab Larry Elder Latinos Latinx Law enforcement Lawsuits Legacy of Slavery Liberal progressives Liberals Liberal Libertarian Lt. Gov. Mark Robinson Lyft MLB MLK MSNBC Mainstream media Markets Marxist Mattel Maxine Waters Media Men Metaphore Michael Brown Middle East policy Minneapolis police department Morality Muslim NAACP NAN NEA Nancy Pelosi National Urban League Nazi Neck Holds Neutrality New Jersey Noam Chomsky Normal Normandy North Carolina Nuclear OPEC Obergefell v. Hodges Oklahoma Olympic trial Opportunity Oracle Oscars PPolice Palestinians Parental choice Pastor Patrisse Cullors Personal freedom Platform Power plant President Donald Trump President Joe Biden President Obama Press Principles Private companies Progressive Progress Race Card Race Racial hatred Racism in America Raphael Warnock Reform Rep. Liz Cheney Rep. Maxine Waters Republican Party Republicans Republican Rich Right to Vote Riots Robert F. Kennedy Rockerfeller Roe vs Wade Rule of Law Russians Russia SAT SEC SJW Scandinavia School Choice Scientists Sen. Bernie Sanders Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer Shawshank redemption Slavery Slaves Slave Social Justice Soviet Union Spacex Speaker Nancy Pelosi Speech Stacey Abrams Steve Crowder Steve Jobs Stock market Students Supporters Supremacist Supreme court Sweden Taxpayers Teachers' Union Tesla The Left The Reverend The Rich The West Thomas Jennings Thomas Sowell Tom Wolf Toymakers Trade workers Truth vs Lies Truth Tulsa 1921 Turnout Twitter US Constitution Uber Uncle Tom Underground Railroad United States flag Unity Vaccine Venezuela Vice President Kamala Harris Victims Victomhood Voter ID Votes Voting Rights Act Voting law Voting WGN WHO WWII WWI Walter Williams Warner Bros. Television Group Washington D.C. Water front Wealth creation Wealth White House White People White Supremacist White Supremacy White cops White-Savior Whites White Woke Racism Woke Women Work Worldview Wuhan YouTube abnormal academia academics access activists advancement adversary affirmative action alcoholic anarchy angry anti-semitic anti-trans antifa antiracists apartments arrested arrest assumptions attacks bad decisions biology boycott bureaucrats burglaries business owners business cancel cukture cancer charity cheating city council civility climte college colorblind colored comedian community compassion competition compliance conservative women contempt conviction corrupt politicians cost courage coverage criminal justice critical race theory culture war culture dad death penality debate delusion democracy dictatorship differential poverty discrimination diveristy driveway economic recovery economics economist economy education election reform elections emotions empathy employees employee employer employment enemies energy entrance exams entrepreneurs equal results ethnicity ethnic evidence executive orders fact-checkers faith leader false narrative farms first amendment force gender confusion gender genocide governance green new deal greenhouse gases groups guilty gun control gun violence handouts hate speech helpless blacks heroine hero homeless homicide human beings hyperbole immigration impeachment individuals inequality inflation information infrastructure inheritance inner-city innovation insurrection interview investments jobs kids labor lawlessness liberty lies life in prison loans lock downs major league baseball mandates manslaughter masks microaggression minimum wage misdemeanor misinformation mob violence money monument moral superiority murder name callling national anthem national debt neopronouns obfuscation officers one race oppressed opt out parents patents paycheck payouts people of color people piplines podium ceremony poineers police brutality police policy political exploitation politicians politics polling poverty power prison private schools progressives protest public health public investment public schools qualified immunity race and culture racial inequalities racism racist nation racist white cops racist radiation radical administration ratings reactor reforms regulations reparations resisting arrest respect restaurant retirement riot role model rules for thee and not for me scholar school second amendment self-reliance sexism sexuality shootings shoplifting skin color snow social distancing social media social security socialism spending standards state run stereotypes subjectivism subsidizing college subsidy systemic racism tactic taxes taxpayer teenagers the poor theft totalitarianism transgender woman transgender trial tribalism triillions tuition unemployment victim culture victimology violence violent crime virology voluntary wages war welfare white privilege women in history