Stanford University's Anti-'American' Wokeness
![Cancel Culture society concept or cultural cancellation and social media censorship as canceling or restricting opinions that are offensive or controversial to the public with 3D illustration elements.](https://storage2.snappages.site/F4MHZ8/assets/images/9941528_1353x774_500.jpg)
By Larry Elder
Stanford University put out a new list of words it considers to be "harmful language." The 13-page "Elimination of Harmful Language Initiative" includes words like "immigrant," which should be replaced by "person who has immigrated." It advises against saying "walk-in hours" in favor of "open hours" to avoid discriminating against and hurting the feeling of those with disabilities. Stanford urges that we drop the phrase "beating a dead horse" because it normalizes violence against animals.
Under a section called "Imprecise Language," the guide suggests replacing the term "American" with "U.S. citizen." It explains: "('American') often refers to people from the United States only, thereby insinuating that the US is the most important country in the Americas." After all, North and South America contain 42 countries. And they have feelings, too.
Goodness, one of my favorite groups growing up was "Jay and the Americans." One can never listen to "Cara Mia" the same way again. What about calling someone "un-American"? Is that elitist, too? Can we still refer to a style as "Americana"?
Do we have to dump the term "the United States of America" in favor of "the United States of One of the 42 Countries in the Americas"? In baseball, we have the National League and, goodness, the American League. Bye-bye, "American Dream," "All American," "All-American Girl," "American Idol," "American exceptionalism," "American Express," "AmWay" and certainly the expression "the American way." Sorry, Superman, and the "never-ending battle for truth, justice and the American way."
But there is good news. This means we can drop that stupid, nonsensical, bizarre term "African American." When a black person from the U.S. visits Africa, Africans do not refer to him or her as "African American." I asked a reporter with The Los Angeles Times why in one paragraph the newspaper used the term "African-American" to describe a black man, and then in the same paragraph, near the end, described him as "black." "What?" I said. "You don't want your readers to get bored, so you switch it up?" I asked him where he was born. He said, "California." I said, "Where are your parents from?" He said, "California." To which I said, "Where are your parents' parents from?" He said, "Russia."
I asked, "Why aren't you a 'Russian-American'? I assure you that my ancestors have been in this country longer than yours. Yet, I have a hyphen when you describe me, but you don't when I describe you?"
OK, Stanford, here are some suggestions for your next edition. Instead of "smash-and-grab robbery," let's use the word "reparations." Instead of the term "Left-wing bigotry," like the Hispanic Los Angeles City Council members and the Hispanic Los Angeles County union leader, the ones caught on tape making racist and disparaging remarks about blacks, a Jew, whites and Mexicans. Let's just call this "Russian disinformation" to get them off the hook. A store thief is an "undocumented shopper." Under your section of imprecise language, advise against saying "black, American conservative," and instead use the term "Uncle Tom." (Be honest -- we know that's what you think.) Southern border crossers are "uninvited guests." Jew hatred is "thoughtful disagreement." A serial killer is a "rogue mortician."
But there is good news. After Stanford put out its language guide, the university immediately became the object of attack and ridicule. It now says the language guide is under review. The school recently issued the following statement: "We have particularly heard concerns about the guide's treatment of the term 'American.' We understand and appreciate those concerns. To be very clear, not only is the use of the term 'American' not banned at Stanford, it is absolutely welcomed" (quote emphasized in the original).
Care to know what it costs to go to Stanford and learn stuff like this? Student expenses for 2022-2023: Tuition $57,693; Room and Board $18,619; Student Fees Allowance $2,145; and Books and Supplies Allowance $1,350. That's a total of $79,807, and doesn't include any document fees, new student orientation fees, personal expenses or travel expenses.
Instead of using the word "outrageous," let's call it "elevated pricing."
Stanford University put out a new list of words it considers to be "harmful language." The 13-page "Elimination of Harmful Language Initiative" includes words like "immigrant," which should be replaced by "person who has immigrated." It advises against saying "walk-in hours" in favor of "open hours" to avoid discriminating against and hurting the feeling of those with disabilities. Stanford urges that we drop the phrase "beating a dead horse" because it normalizes violence against animals.
Under a section called "Imprecise Language," the guide suggests replacing the term "American" with "U.S. citizen." It explains: "('American') often refers to people from the United States only, thereby insinuating that the US is the most important country in the Americas." After all, North and South America contain 42 countries. And they have feelings, too.
Goodness, one of my favorite groups growing up was "Jay and the Americans." One can never listen to "Cara Mia" the same way again. What about calling someone "un-American"? Is that elitist, too? Can we still refer to a style as "Americana"?
Do we have to dump the term "the United States of America" in favor of "the United States of One of the 42 Countries in the Americas"? In baseball, we have the National League and, goodness, the American League. Bye-bye, "American Dream," "All American," "All-American Girl," "American Idol," "American exceptionalism," "American Express," "AmWay" and certainly the expression "the American way." Sorry, Superman, and the "never-ending battle for truth, justice and the American way."
But there is good news. This means we can drop that stupid, nonsensical, bizarre term "African American." When a black person from the U.S. visits Africa, Africans do not refer to him or her as "African American." I asked a reporter with The Los Angeles Times why in one paragraph the newspaper used the term "African-American" to describe a black man, and then in the same paragraph, near the end, described him as "black." "What?" I said. "You don't want your readers to get bored, so you switch it up?" I asked him where he was born. He said, "California." I said, "Where are your parents from?" He said, "California." To which I said, "Where are your parents' parents from?" He said, "Russia."
I asked, "Why aren't you a 'Russian-American'? I assure you that my ancestors have been in this country longer than yours. Yet, I have a hyphen when you describe me, but you don't when I describe you?"
OK, Stanford, here are some suggestions for your next edition. Instead of "smash-and-grab robbery," let's use the word "reparations." Instead of the term "Left-wing bigotry," like the Hispanic Los Angeles City Council members and the Hispanic Los Angeles County union leader, the ones caught on tape making racist and disparaging remarks about blacks, a Jew, whites and Mexicans. Let's just call this "Russian disinformation" to get them off the hook. A store thief is an "undocumented shopper." Under your section of imprecise language, advise against saying "black, American conservative," and instead use the term "Uncle Tom." (Be honest -- we know that's what you think.) Southern border crossers are "uninvited guests." Jew hatred is "thoughtful disagreement." A serial killer is a "rogue mortician."
But there is good news. After Stanford put out its language guide, the university immediately became the object of attack and ridicule. It now says the language guide is under review. The school recently issued the following statement: "We have particularly heard concerns about the guide's treatment of the term 'American.' We understand and appreciate those concerns. To be very clear, not only is the use of the term 'American' not banned at Stanford, it is absolutely welcomed" (quote emphasized in the original).
Care to know what it costs to go to Stanford and learn stuff like this? Student expenses for 2022-2023: Tuition $57,693; Room and Board $18,619; Student Fees Allowance $2,145; and Books and Supplies Allowance $1,350. That's a total of $79,807, and doesn't include any document fees, new student orientation fees, personal expenses or travel expenses.
Instead of using the word "outrageous," let's call it "elevated pricing."
![Larry Elder](https://storage2.snappages.site/F4MHZ8/assets/images/9760997_89x102_500.jpg)
[Larry Elder is a best-selling author and nationally syndicated radio talk-show host. To find out more about Larry Elder, or become an "Elderado," visit www.LarryElder.com. Follow Larry on Twitter @larryelder. To read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate webpage at www.creators.com.]
COPYRIGHT 2022 LAURENCE A. ELDER
DISTRIBUTED BY CREATORS.COM
COPYRIGHT 2022 LAURENCE A. ELDER
DISTRIBUTED BY CREATORS.COM
Posted in Opinion
Posted in Larry Elder, Stanford University, Woke, censorship, War on words, Free Speech, America, Imprecise language, #freedomsjournalmagazine, Freedoms Journal Institute
Posted in Larry Elder, Stanford University, Woke, censorship, War on words, Free Speech, America, Imprecise language, #freedomsjournalmagazine, Freedoms Journal Institute
Recent
Archive
2024
January
Cartoon 01/01/24Cartoon 01/02/24Claudine Gay Betrayed the American Values of My Black Elders to Exploit White GuiltCartoon 01/03/24Cartoon 01/05/24Cartoon 01/06/24Cartoon 01/07/24Cartoon 01/08/24We need a David, not a SaulCartoon 01/13/24Cartoon 01/09/24Cartoon 01/10/24Cartoon 01/11/24Cartoon 01/14/24Cartoon 01/12/24What Happens to a King Deferred? A ReduxCartoon 01/15/24Cartoon 01/16/24The Good Guys with Guns Part 1Cartoon 01/17/24America Works. DEI Doesn’t.Cartoon 01/18/24Cartoon 01/23/24Good Guys with Guns Part 2Cartoon 01/19/24Cartoon 01/21/24Cartoon 01/22/24Cartoon 01/24/24Cartoon 01/26/24Cartoon 01/25/24Cartoon 01/27/24
February
Cartoon 02/04/24Cartoon 02/03/24Cartoon 02/02/24Cartoon 02/01/24Cartoon 01/31/24Cartoon 01/28/24Cartoon 01/29/24We’ve Been Gay(ed) Part 1Cartoon 02/05/24Cartoon 02/06/24Cartoon 02/07/24Cartoon 02/08/24Cartoon 02/13/24Cartoon 02/12/24Cartoon 02/09/24Cartoon 02/11/24Cartoon 02/10/24Cartoon 02/19/24'Black America at Crossroads’ of Culture Wars as Presidential Election LoomsWe’ve Been Gay(ed) Part 2Cartoon 02/18/24Cartoon 02/17/24Cartoon 02/16/24Cartoon 02/15/24Cartoon 02/14/24Cartoon 02/22/24Cartoon 02/21/24Cartoon 02/20/24America Needs a “Black Wives Matter†Movement To Rebuild the Black FamilyCartoon 02/23/24Cartoon 02/24/24Cartoon 02/25/24Cartoon 02/26/24Cartoon 02/27/24
March
Cartoon 03/07/24Cartoon 03/06/24Cartoon 03/04/24Cartoon 03/03/24Cartoon 02/29/24Cartoon 02/28/24Cartoon 03/05/24Cartoon 03/02/24Cartoon 03/08/24Cartoon 03/10/24Cartoon 03/09/24The Debt...and it isn’t Climate ChangeCartoon 03/11/24Cartoon 03/24/24Cartoon 03/25/24Cartoon 03/23/24Cartoon 03/22/24Cartoon 03/21/24Cartoon 03/20/24Cartoon 03/26/24
April
No Comments